The way we personally acquire our own group identities are very
complex and difficult. The way that we assign a group identity to others
besides are ourselves is also very difficult. Race and ethnic group labels
often vary with different opinions. Not everyone will agree, understand, and
use this criteria. Because not everyone
will agree with each other someone may label you in a way that you don’t
consider correct and might even take an offense to it. In order to really
comprehend the diversity in the world you have to understand the criteria that’s
commonly used to make group distinctions. Race and Ethnicity are the most
common criteria’s.
Ethnicity is the term for the culture of people in a given
geographic region, including their language, heritage, religion and customs. To
be a member of an ethnic group is to conform to some or all of those practices.
The term race refers to groups of people who have differences and similarities
in biological traits deemed by society to be socially significant, meaning that
people treat other people differently because of them. Race and ethnicity can
obviously overlap, but they are yet quite different. A girl that is considered
Asian, Japanese-American to be exact, could can consider herself Japanese or
East Asian race, but, if she doesn't really participate in their traditions or
practices she can identify herself as an American.
Today the theory of race has been utterly transformed. The
socially constructed status of the concept of race, which we have labeled the
racial formation process, is widely recognized. (Omi and Winant 1986) Racial
formation is "the process by which social, economic and political forces
determine the content and importance of racial categories, and by which they
are in turn shaped by racial meanings." It's a sociological theory and
it's a bit complicated. It looks at race as a socially constructed identity,
where the content and importance of racial categories is determined by social, economic
and political forces. Unlike traditional race theories, in Michael Omi and
Howard Winant's view, "racial meanings pervade US society, extending from
the shaping of individual racial identities to the structuring of collective
political action on the terrain of the state." Race was seen as a static
and unchanging concept based purely on physical criteria like biology and
upbringing. Omi and Winant suggest that race is somewhat fluid where "the
racial order is organized and enforced by the continuity and reciprocity
between micro-level (personal interactions with other people) and macro-level
(social structures and common ideologies of a society like business, media,
government, cultural and stereotypical beliefs on race, class, sexuality and
gender) of social relations."
Your choice of topic is great. It gives an insightful evaluation of the difference between race and ethnicity. I like how you took two of the major themes we learned in class and broke them down further in a more in-depth manner. Providing definitions for each term helps the reader distinguish between race and ethnicity. It also helps the reader understand that there is a set difference and that society does have the tendency to identify them wrongly. Your use of outside sources aids in strengthening your response. A suggestion I would have, would be to provide more outside examples of how society mixes up the two terms. Maybe give two or three examples of how society uses them wrong and show the correct use of the terms within these examples. Besides that, your supporting evidence is very helpful and it is a great read.
ReplyDelete-Thelmari Raubenheimer